This is another one of Alex Tavoularis's 1975 Storyboards. Quite some time ago, I shot them with my little instamatic and uploaded them. Friends who have been on my page probably recognize the images. I'm reuploading them for two reasons -- one, the instamatic captures weren't the greatest quality. Two, repetition never hurts. Or, at least not too badly :) not with Star Wars.
I rescanned them in an attempt to replicate their originals, which are pencils on tracing paper. The jpg below gets closer to capturing the original board, though the digitizing process strengthens the lines, making the pencil strokes appear more like markers.
Showing posts with label Storyboards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Storyboards. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Alex Tavoularis storyboards
I've shared these before. I'm looking through my hard drive and re-sharing a few things. These are Alex Tavoularis' boards which fans keep asking me to sell. I get messages on my private email from folks lusting after these. And no, they will not be part of the Brownie point loot, so don't start salivating. I'm sharing these for everyone can enjoy. Suppose i should really rescan these so they aren't skewed. Well, one day....
A very early concept drawing, when we dabbled around with the idea of Luke being a she.
An early Chewie when the wookie was clean shaven :)
An early Chewie when the wookie was clean shaven :)
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Flash Gordon Storyboards by Mentor Huebner
FLASH GORDON storyboards - there was question as to who the artist was on the Flash Gordon Storyboards. Dino had given these to me years and years ago, saying, in that off-hand way he has, "Here, take these, you like them, these are from Mentor," so I always assumed they were his. Someone here pointed out the boards I was uploading may not be done by Mentor, and provided a link to a Flash Gordon site and Mentor's site indicating which work he did on Flash Gordon. I wondered if Dino was wrong, and let it go... Then I found 4 more boards -- the originals of these are very large, and in the bottom corner they have Mentor's signature. These are first generation production copies -- which means in the process of copying, their lines have been altered. Reduced, the charcoal marks become even thicker and rougher, but in their original scale, the work looks different. The first 2 of are one board, but was too large to fit on the scanner so are two jpgs. The 3rd is his signature and the 4 is a fax copy which was sent from the set to the office, reduced down to an 8x11.
I have 4 more frames of the same scene in the larger format. When you look at them side by side, it's apparent that they're the same. Reducing the large work or scanning it on line art setting vs magazine setting will give you a different look. Line art scanning setting increases the width of lines, so the work appears different. Xeroxing -- dark fine line becomes thicker and darker, but very fine lines disappear. The work ends up looking different. Took me awhile to figure it out on the scanner. You'd think scanning drawn artwork the setting to use is line art, but no, it isn't. A more accurate representation is either photograph or magazine scanner settings.
Labels:
Dino DeLaurentis,
FLASH GORDON,
Mentor Huebner,
Storyboards
Flash Gordon Storyboards, Artist Unknown - Mentor Huebner or Bill Stallion?
Dino gave these to me, saying they were by Mentor Huebner. With the exception of the double sepia faxes, these are the final, original drawings which would have been used by everyone, from the art department to production office. This is the sequence thus far uploaded. Dan Short brought up a question of whether they were Mentor's or not. What do you think? Are they Mentor's? ... Not that it matters because I think this is a great sequence, but I'd hate to have presented these as Mentor's if they are not. Think by looking at this body of work you can tell me whether you see the same hand at work, and if its Mentor's, or some other artist's work.
John Scoleri adds: "Glen Mullaly (via Graham Hill and IMDB) identified Bill Stallion as the possible culprit, and after comparing to some of his work, it seems pretty conclusive to me."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















































